The Common Law Problem: Rhone v Stephens [1994]
Under English common law, while restrictive covenants (agreements not to do something) can bind successors in title under Tulk v Moxhay [1848], positive covenants (agreements to perform an act or pay money) do not run with the land.
If Seller A sells to Buyer B with an overage clause, and Buyer B sells to Buyer C without paying, Seller A has no legal standing to sue Buyer C for the money.
To bypass this limitation, conveyancers deploy the 'Chain of Direct Covenants & Restriction' mechanism:
1. Direct Covenant: Buyer B covenants that they will not transfer the land unless the new buyer executes a direct Deed of Adherence with Seller A.
2. Form L Restriction: Seller A registers a statutory restriction in the Land Registry title register:
'No disposition of the registered estate by the proprietor of the registered estate... is to be registered without a certificate signed by [Seller] or their conveyancer that the provisions of [the Overage Deed] have been complied with.'